March 25, 2023

Elon Musk won’t ever cease posting, regardless of who tells him to cease.

That was one of many takeaways from his transient testimony throughout his securities fraud trial, which passed off in a San Francisco courthouse Friday. Legal professionals for the plaintiffs peppered Musk with questions on his tweets as they work as much as his notorious “funding secured” tweet from 2018 on the middle of this case. Musk is being sued by a category of Tesla buyers who declare his bumbling makes an attempt to take Tesla non-public that yr value them tens of millions of {dollars}.

Musk wasn’t requested about that tweet but, although. He took the stand for slightly over half-hour earlier than the trial recessed till subsequent Monday. However the plaintiff’s attorneys received in loads of questions on his Twitter habits, most notably about all of the folks in his life who’ve begged him to give up the chook web site.

Among the many individuals who requested him to cease tweeting are Antonio Gracias, a former director on Tesla’s board, buyers Ron Baron and Sam Teller, Musk’s former de facto chief of workers, and different shut associates.

Musk received loads of questions on his Twitter habits, most notably about all of the folks in his life who’ve begged him to give up

“I suppose I continued to tweet, sure,” Musk replied when requested if he ignored his advisors and buyers.

(Price noting: Musk tweeted a mere seven minutes earlier than taking the stand and waited roughly 45 minutes after stepping down earlier than sending his subsequent tweet.)

The plaintiffs are working to painting Musk as a reckless tweeter who disregards good recommendation in regards to the important affect his public statements can have on his firm’s inventory value and shareholders. Early in his testimony, Musk was requested to explain the connection between his tweets and Tesla’s retail buyers.

“I care an excellent deal about retail buyers,” Musk stated. “There are our most loyal and steadfast buyers.”

It’s straightforward to ascertain how this assertion will come again to hang-out him later within the trial, as plaintiffs’ attorneys are more likely to remind him of the monetary ache his tweets have prompted these buyers.

“I care an excellent deal about retail buyers,” Musk stated.

Musk was additionally requested to expound on one in all his favourite topics: quick sellers. Tesla is likely one of the most shorted shares available on the market, and Musk has made no secret of his contempt for buyers who wager in opposition to the success of his firm.

“I imagine quick promoting must be made unlawful,” he stated. “It’s a means, in my view, for dangerous folks on Wall Road to steal cash from small buyers. Not good.”

A lot of the day’s testimony was dedicated to Guhan Subramanian, a Harvard Enterprise Faculty professor and an professional witness for the plaintiffs, who described how uncommon and unprecedented it was for Musk to attempt to tweet his manner by means of Tesla’s managed buyout.

“What’s actually completely different right here is the communication of fabric private details about a managed buyout over Twitter,” Subramanian testified. “That’s simply by no means been finished earlier than.”

A doable signal of Musk’s much-reported exhaustion: late in his testimony, he stated there have been “two most important firms that I run and the place I’m basically the chief technologist and product particular person” — SpaceX and Tesla.

There was no point out of working a 3rd firm, Twitter.